Do community-based food security programs work?

Public transfer programs that allow beneficiaries to choose the transferred good may be more efficient, but the poorest beneficiaries may not participate if the good chosen is too costly. A model shows that program targeting and consumption impacts are tied to selected quality of the provided good. Evidence from a randomized trial in rural India in which groups of beneficiaries choose the variety of rice to be offered as a subsidized loan confirms that choosing lower cost goods self-targets the program towards the poorest beneficiaries. Consumption impacts are biggest for wealthiest households and may be negative for moderately poor households.

Link to paper(s)



Jun 2017
Field Notes: Documenting the stories of Self-Help Group (SHG) leaders
Qualitative data collection
May 2017
How can qualitative research provide insight into a project's impact?
Development sociology in impact evaluations
Apr 2017
How do you collect continuous in-depth qualitative data on women's empowerment?
Ethnographic data collection in Bihar
Sep 2016
How do you collect data from 100 village meetings in a single day?
Community Professionals training in Tamil Nadu